Legal Opinion

TEMPLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 18, 2020No. 3:19-cv-19243Unknown

1Opinion

*NOT FOR PUBLICATION* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY _______________________________________ MARGARET TEMPLE, Appellant, v. Civil Action No. 19-19243 (FLW) ANDREW SAUL, OPINION Commissioner of Social Security Appellee. WOLFSON, Chief Judge: Appellant Margaret Temple (“Appellant” or “Temple”) challenges Social Security Administration Commissioner Andrew Saul’s (“Appellee” or “Commissioner”) determination that she is not eligible for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 1381

et seq. Because substantial evidence supports…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API