Legal Opinion

Hogan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1981No. WW-400Published

1Per curiam

Hogan appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence, arguing that he was entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the Florida Youthful Offender Act, Section 958.011, et seq., Florida Statutes (1979). We agree and reverse.

The trial court ruled that Hogan’s conviction for armed robbery precluded his treatment as a youthful offender. At the time of his order, the trial judge did not have the benefit of our ruling in Lee v. State, 399 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), in which we held that an armed robbery conviction does not preclude youthful offender treatment. Accordingly, the order is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API