Legal Opinion

The Strathnairn

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 8, 1911No. Nos. 4,482, 4,487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits by the Washington Stevedore Company against the steamship Strathnairn. Rothschild & Company, agents, claimants, and by the McCabe Company against the steamship Herm, Roths-childs & Company, agents,' claimants. On exceptions to libels.

1Opinion of the Court

DONWORTH, District Judge.

These two libels are in rein, and are substantially identical in their allegations. Like exceptions,to the libel in each case have been filed, and the two cases have been argued together and submitted on the same briefs. Eor convenience I will specifically refer only to the libel and exceptions in the case of the Strathnairn, as the differences in detail between the two cases do not call for any statement.

The first three exceptions go to the point that the facts alleged in the libel fail to show any maritime or other lien against the steamship or any other cause of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  2. Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Scott v. Ira ChaffeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1880
  4. Boutin v. RuddCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  5. Jacobi v. The EugeneDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steamship Overdale Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. The RancaguaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API