In the interest of L.A.M.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ABBOTT, J.:
The appellant, Arturo Puente, in his capacity as a Consulate for Mexico, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment.
At the trial court level, the maternal grandfather, Lauriano Pardina Roman, and the Consulate requested that they be given interested party status pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1541, and that the trial court vacate the judgment granting custody to a paternal aunt and uncle. The facts can be found in In re L.A.M., 268 Kan. 441, 996 P.2d 834 (2000).
*449The grandfather is not a party to this appeal and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Mario Benjamin Murphy v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, Mario Benjamin Murphy v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, United Mexican States, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Esparza-PonceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- Republic of Paraguay v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- In the interest of L.A.M.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RosasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- In Re LAMSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000