Legal Opinion

Hoult v. Hoult (In re Hoult)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 25, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 97-16663-8P7; Adversary No. 97-1059Published

1Opinion of the Court

*769ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 11

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.

THE MATTER under consideration in this Chapter 7 liquidation case is the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 filed by Plaintiff, Jennifer Hoult (Ms. Hoult), which is based upon Ms. Hoult’s contention that the Defendant, David Hoult (Debtor), and his counsel willfully violated the certification requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(e)(1)(A) and Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9011 by filing the Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 22) in this adversary proceeding. In support of her Motion, Ms. Hoult…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Black (In Re Black)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  2. Worrell v. Grim (In Re Grim)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API