Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Enlarged City School District & Troy Teachers Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kane, J. P.
Petitioner and respondent are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter agreement) effective for the 1983 to 1986 school years. Article IX (H) of the agreement provides that: "Instructional duties currently being performed by members and the bargaining unit shall not be performed by anyone outside the unit and such instructional duties in new educational programs established by the District shall be performed only by members of the bargaining unit.” In contravention of that provision, petitioner appointed Donald Bassett, a nonmember of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sweet Home Central School District v. Sweet Home Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sweet Home Central School District v. Sweet Home Education Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Belmont Central School District v. Belmont Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Riverhead Central School District v. Riverhead Central Faculty Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Meehan v. Nassau Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989