Legal Opinion

Burger King Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Tax Court, 9 N.J.Tax 251, setting aside a deficiency assessed by the Director of the Division of Taxation. The sole question presented is whether the face value of nonreimbursable coupons for which the retailer receives no remuneration is taxable as a receipt from the sale of food or drink under N.J.S.A. 54:32B-2(d) and N.J.S.A. 54:32B-3(c).

The facts are not in dispute. Burger King, a subsidiary of The Pillsbury Company, sells a variety of food and drink products in its establishments both for take-out and on-premises consumption. In the course…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Adventure, Inc. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1984
  2. Burger King Corp. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liptak v. Rite Aid, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Boardwalk Regency Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API