Legal Opinion

State v. Papen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 2002No. 87,000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Steven Papen was convicted by a jury of premeditated first-degree murder of Dana Anderson. A hard 50 sentence was imposed. He appeals his conviction and sentence.

On appeal, Papen argues that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Papen’s expert psychological witness and in responding to the jury’s request regarding the testimony of a witness; (2) the especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance was unconstitutionally vague; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. HobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. CooperwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. MartisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API