Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruce Levine v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 12, 2018No. 17-1342; 17-1432Published

1DissentWynn, Circuit Judge

Consider the auto insurance policy at issue in this case, which has two relevant components. The first-the Declarations Pages-states that the Liability portion of the policy covers "Any 'Auto' " and that the Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist ("UIM") portion covers "Owned 'Autos' Only." J.A. 68, 148. The second-the UIM Endorsement-provides that, for purposes of that Endorsement, a "[c]overed auto" is "a motor vehicle ... with respect to which the 'bodily injury' or 'property damage' liability coverage of the policy applies." J.A. 104 (emphasis added). In other words, because the Liability policy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Virginia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Seals v. Erie Ins. ExchangeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Stone v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API