Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Blake v. County of Kauai Planning Commission.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000342Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I agree with the majority that all of the counts in the complaint are ripe for adjudication, and that the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit (the court) and the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) erred in concluding otherwise. However, we should resolve on appeal the parties’ partial motions for summary judgment.1

*139I.

Previously, this court has ruled on a motion for summary judgment on appeal even though the trial court dismissed the motion without issuing a ruling on the merits. In Bush v. Watson, 81 Hawai'i 474, 918 P.2d 1130 (1996), the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. American National Bank And Trust Company Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Gregg Kendall & Associates, Inc. v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kau v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API