Legal Opinion

Wall v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1912No. S.F. No. 5595PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs, as heirs at law of Alice Brown, deceased, to quiet title to an undivided one-fourth interest in a certain lot of land in the city and county of San Francisco, to which, in his answer, the defendant, Brown, asserted sole ownership.

The case was tried on stipulated facts. Thomas Brown, the defendant, and Alice Brown, deceased, were husband and wife, and on May 26, 1876, said Thomas Brown acquired title to the lot in question as community property. On June 26, 1885, said Alice Brown filed a valid declaration of homestead on this property which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of TeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brandon v. FariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. In Re the Estate of ShireyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Dixon v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API