Klotz v. St. Anthony's Medical Center
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Concurrence · WolffMichael A. Wolff, Judge
Introduction
Does a legislated limit on damages in actions for personal wrongs — which were triable to juries when Missouri’s constitution was adopted — violate the constitutional guarantee that the right to trial by jury “shall remain inviolate?”
I agree with the unanimous conclusion in the per curiam opinion that this case is governed by State ex rel. St. Louis-San *772Francisco Ry. Co. v. Buder, 515 S.W.2d 409 (Mo.1974), because, as to James and Mary Klotz, the 2005 statutory limit on non economic damages — enacted after James Klotz suffered his injury — is a law “retrospective in operation” in…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Teitelman.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.