Legal Opinion

Klotz v. St. Anthony's Medical Center

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 25, 2010No. SC90107Published

1Concurrence · WolffMichael A. Wolff, Judge

Introduction

Does a legislated limit on damages in actions for personal wrongs — which were triable to juries when Missouri’s constitution was adopted — violate the constitutional guarantee that the right to trial by jury “shall remain inviolate?”

I agree with the unanimous conclusion in the per curiam opinion that this case is governed by State ex rel. St. Louis-San *772Francisco Ry. Co. v. Buder, 515 S.W.2d 409 (Mo.1974), because, as to James and Mary Klotz, the 2005 statutory limit on non economic damages — enacted after James Klotz suffered his injury — is a law “retrospective in operation” in…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Teitelman.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API