Legal Opinion

Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1971No. 43027Published

1Opinion of the Court

485 P.2d 235 (1971)

BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Charles A. MOHR, Jr., Defendant in Error.

No. 43027.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 18, 1971.

G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., Sam Helman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

James R. Eagleton, Oklahoma City, Henry L. Fist, Coleman Robison, Rosenstein, Livingston, Fist & Ringold, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

DAVIDSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine (herein referred to as Board) from the judgment of the lower court in favor of Charles A. Mohr,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Guardian Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. MohrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Gregory v. McInnisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API