Legal Opinion

Giral v. Nienuis

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided October 19, 2021No. 8:21-cv-00964Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION OCTAVIO GIRAL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:21-cv-964-KKM-AEP AL NIENUIS, SHAUN KLUCZNIK, D. CARRIVEAU, J. PABON R. SCHMIDT S. WALTON, and WILLIAM INGERSOLL, Defendants. ____________________________________ ORDER Plaintiff Octavio Giral, a pretrial detainee, brings a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right of access to the courts. I. Legal Background A. Section 1915 Although federal courts must read a plaintiff’s pro se allegations in a liberal fashion, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API