Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilderness Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2010No. 08-17406Published

1DissentBybee, Circuit Judge

This should not have been a hard case. For more than seventy years, “[t]he dominant wildlife and habitat management theme for the Kofa ... has been the preservation of the desert bighorn sheep species.” 1 For much of that period, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), together with the BLM and the Arizona Game and Fish Department (“AGFD”), has supplied water to bighorn herds in the Kofa. So it is no surprise that after observing a dramatic decline in the bighorn population in this region, the Service proposed a variety of non-mutually exclusive solutions, including redevelopment of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API