Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dempsey v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 27, 2005No. 04SC362Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Bender

To be consistent with First Amendment principles, the majority applies the three elements test articulated in the seminal ease of In re Kay, to determine that Dempsey’s conviction for disrupting a lawful assembly is not supported by sufficient evidence. 1 Cal.3d 930, 83 Cal.Rptr. 686, 464 P.2d 142 (1970). However, the majority fails to require, as Kay does, that the jury consider these very same elements in a prosecution for disrupting a lawful assembly when the defendant claims he is exercising his constitutionally protected free speech rights. Id., 83 Cal.Rptr. 686, 464 P.2d at 153. In my…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. HardinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. State v. SchwingOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. McMahon v. Albany Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API