Ross v. Healy
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The question involved in this case arises over the ownership of a dog. The defendant, P. J. Healy, in March, 1899, purchased in San Francisco a dark red Irish setter, then about six weeks old. This dog remained in his possession in San Francisco until September 3, 1902. On September 1, 1902, defendant purchased a collar, had it marked “ P. J. Healey,” and placed it upon the dog’s neck. This dog, with the collar still around his neck, was brought to this city by the defendant, and was in his possession, wearing the same collar, down to March, 1903. The plaintiff procured her dog in 1895, then…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lamm v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905