Potts v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
Appellant was charged by information with delivery of cannabis and possession of cocaine. He was found guilty by a jury as charged and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently.
Appellant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of the discovery violations by the state listed below:1
1. Failure to disclose oral statements made by appellant.
2. Failure to produce oral statements of the undercover arresting officer.
3. Failure to disclose the search of appellant’s person and seizure of cocaine thereby.
Inasmuch as the trial court did…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Brey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Lockhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donahue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985