Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Pirie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1909Published

Appeal by Raphael Krasnow from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 7th day of April, 1908.

1DissentWoodward, J.

(dissenting) :

I am unable to concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burr. The suggestion that the allegation of the petition that John T. Pirie is a creditor of the decedent to the amount of $325 and interest from December 17, 1896, is a mere conclusion, does not strike me as having force. It is clearly a statement of a fact. He says the decedent owes him the sum of $325 and interest from a certain date. What more can he do ? He is not obliged to plead his evidence, to say that he owes him $325 on a promissory note, and to set out the note; he complies with the requirement of section 481 of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merritt v. . BartholickNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Byrnes v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Matter of Application of HaxtunNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Manne v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API