Legal Opinion

Burnside v. City of Everett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 20, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is an action of tort against a city for injuries caused by the overflow of a sewer through a connecting drain into the plaintiff’s cellar. At the trial in the Superior Court, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and the only exceptions relate to questions of evidence.

It appeared in evidence that the injury was done on the night of February 28, 1902, when there was a very heavy rainfall, lasting four hours, amounting to seventy-eight one hundredths of an inch per hour; that the sewer connected with the metropolitan sewer, and had an overflow pipe twenty-four inches in diameter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marvin v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Eames v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Howes v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Gilbert v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. McCarthy v. Boston Duck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Robitaille v. Netoco Community Theatre of North Attleboro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Central Copper Co. v. KlefischArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Vallen v. CullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API