Charles Rettig & Son v. Becker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 179, Oct. T., 1898, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 84, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Opinion by W. D. Porter, J. Exceptions to auditor’s report.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 179, Oct. T., 1898, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 84, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Opinion by W. D. Porter, J. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Koch, J. It appears from the record that property of Caroline Beclter was sold by the sheriff for $650 and the court appointed an auditor to distribute the funds, which were claimed by plaintiffs on an execution issued' by them on a judgment bond and by the Tamaqua Building & Loan Association as assignee of Caroline Becker who issued a writ of execution upon a judgment bond given…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
Elizabeth Becker was desirous of becoming the representative of the plaintiffs, for the purpose of receiving and selling their goods at Tamaqua and collecting the accounts resulting from said sales, and negotiations had been in progress to that end. It had been understood between the parties that Elizabeth Becker would be required to give to plaintiffs a bond in $1,000, with surety, conditioned for the payment of any amount in which she should become indebted to plaintiffs in conducting the business. A duly authorized agent of plaintiffs visited Elizabeth Becker, on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Commonwealth v. MoltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Logan v. Gardner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1890
- Mott v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
- Twitchell v. McMurtrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.