Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Smith & Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 10, 1950PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 N.J. Super. 82 (1950)
76 A.2d 697
NETTIE HOLLANDER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SMITH & SMITH, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 18, 1950.
Decided November 10, 1950.
Before Judges JACOBS, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Bernard Freedman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Koehler, Augenblick & Freedman, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph Coult, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent, Smith & Smith.
Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg argued the cause for the respondents, Robert M. Taafe and John B. Hannon (Mr. Samuel D. Williams, attorney, and Mr. Israel…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nazareth v. Herndon Ambulance Serv.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Cafone v. Spiniello Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Bedee v. American Medical Response of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jackson v. HankinsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Lakewood Trust Co. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.