Legal Opinion

Klyn v. Aruta

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1986No. CA 11-111Published

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, J.

Defendant-appellant Michael Aruta has perfected a timely appeal and seeks a reversal of the jury’s assessment of damages on two grounds: that the trial court committed error when it granted a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee Deborah Klyn and against him on the issue of liability, and on the basis that the trial court refused to instruct the jury on the issue of plaintiff-appellee’s comparative negligence.

The facts before the court establish that on July 3, 1983, Deborah Klyn (hereinafter referred to simply as “ap-pellee”), Angela Untisz and Tony “Bart” Long went water skiing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Junge v. BrothersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hitchens v. HahnOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Roeder v. Fischer's Bakery, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API