American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff (“ATT”) and defendant both move pursuant to Rule 56(a), F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment. They have submitted a joint 9(g) statement, and there are no material issues of fact to be resolved.
Facts 1
When ATT filed its 1964 federal income tax return, it claimed a foreign tax credit of $269,085.10 based on its payment of a 15% Canadian income tax of non-residents for 1964. 2 In 1966 Canada made an additional assessment of $763,272.90 Canadian dollars against ATT for 1964 under the same 15% Canadian income tax of non-residents. 3 Although…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Comprehensive Designers International, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978