Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1933No. Nos. 316—318Published

1DissentJustice Stone

I think the decrees should be reversed.

The Court’s conclusion that the employment of Dun-more and Lowell did not contemplate that they should exercise inventive faculties in their service to the government, and that both courts below so found, seems to render superfluous much that is said in the opinion. For it has not been contended, and I certainly do not contend, that if such were the fact there would be .any foundation for the claim asserted by the government. But I think the record does not support the Court's conclusion of fact. I am also unable to agree with the reasoning of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API