Legal Opinion

Bank of South Jacksonville v. Cammar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 26, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment. The declaration contains two counts. The first is in the statutory form. The second alleges the claim of the defendant adversely to the plaintiff of the land described. The plea to each count is not guilty,- with a special plea to the first count denying possession. It was stipulated that the parties claim title from a designated common source, the stipulation providing that it should not be construed as an admission by defendant of possession by her of the land sued for. Upon a trial, objections of defendant having been sustained to the introduction in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andreu v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  2. Campbell ex rel. Estate of Campbell v. CarruthSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Hogans v. CarruthSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  4. Walker v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. Ansley v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Providence Square Ass'n v. BiancardiSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Connelly v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Routh v. Williams, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Neves v. FlannerySupreme Court of Florida · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API