Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dee-El Garage, Inc. v. Korzen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1972No. 44455, 44526Published

1DissentJustice Kluczynski

I must dissent from the majority opinion which construes the taxation of a leasehold estate in real property under section 26 of the Revenue Act of 1939, as amended (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1969, ch. 120, par. 507), to be a use tax and thus unconstitutional. Ill. Const. (1870), art. IV, sec. 13.

While the majority admits that the General Assembly possesses the authority to tax a leasehold interest as real estate, they arrive at their conclusion that the tax in question is a use tax by isolating and dissecting section 26, as amended, from the remainder of the Revenue Act and overemphasizing the words…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Anderson v. City of Park RidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Olympic Hotel Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of Chicago v. University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API