Legal Opinion

City of Schenectady v. State

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.

The complaint demands that section 131 of the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L. 1940, ch. 254, § 131, as amd. by L. 1974, ch. 439, -§ 1) approved May 23,1974, be declared inapplicable to the plaintiffs, or, if not, unconstitutional. The relief requested is based on the theory that the enactment is an unconstitutional delegation of the State’s taxing power in violation of section 1 of article XVI of the New York State Constitution and permits New York City (the only city qualifying by population under the act) to tax beyond its territorial jurisdiction. It is further alleged that section 131 is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. College Barn, Inc. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bankers Trust New York Corp. v. Department of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API