Legal Opinion

Snell v. Rousseau

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The plaintiff was a dealer in flour. The defendant Henri Rousseau was a baker, who made purchases of flour from the plaintiff from time to time upon an open account. He made payments irregularly, which were credited on this account; and also, at times, gave notes to the plaintiff, but no credit was given on the account until the notes were paid. On April 18, 1921, the account showed a balance claim against the defendant Henri Rousseau of *561$937. On that day Henri Rousseau made and delivered to the plaintiff, as payee, a promissory note indorsed by the defendant Omer Rousseau. This note, which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Crompton v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Cushman v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Worthley v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Lampasona v. CapriottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Carlson v. Lawrence H. Oppenheim Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Warren Brothers Co. v. Sentry Ins.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Chase v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API