Legal Opinion
Elk Street Market Corp. v. Rothenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Upon return of plaintiff’s order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue, first, enjoining defendant from engaging in the produce business at any place in *244Erie county, except unit No. 8 in plaintiff’s market, and second, enjoining defendant from inducing or attempting to induce other tenants of plaintiff to remove from the premises and engage in business elsewhere, the Special Term made an order granting the first part of the motion and denying the second. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the order as denies a part of its motion, and defendant appeals from the order so far…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Brighton by the Sea, Inc. v. RivkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Shubert Theatrical Co. v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Huntington v. Cortland Home Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Jenkins v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by15 opinions
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Avon Products, Inc. v. BersonNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Brearton v. Fina, New York County Courts1956
- Kaylon, Inc. v. Collegiate Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- New York State Soccer Football Ass'n v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.