Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Beckwith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1977Published

1Dissent

Mahoney, J. (dissenting).

We dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion of Surrogate Keane (87 Misc 2d 649).

Kane and Larkin, JJ., concur with Sweeney, J.; Koreman, P. J., and Mahoney, J., dissent and vote to affirm in an opinion by Mahoney, J.

Decree modified, on the law and the facts, so as to determine that there has been no effective exercise of the power of appointment given to Louella Beckwith in the will of Hugh T. Beckwith, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs payable out of the estate.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of BeckwithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976