Blakeslee v. Turgrimson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arthur W. Deselm, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
The fact that Turgrimson had a lien on the goods in question did not make him liable for their storage. But if his acts and conduct indicated a purpose. to take the control and management of the. goods, he thereafter became liable for the subsequent storage of the goods. Driggs v. Dean, 167 N. Y. 121.
Turgrimson’s bill to foreclose Ms mortgage on said goods was necessarily based on the theory that there had been such a breach of the conditions of the mortgage as gave him the right to take possession of the mortgaged property. The statute of June 5,1889, provides that no chattel mortgage on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Driggs v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elliot v. Villa Park Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Smith's Transfer & Storage Co. v. Reliable Stores Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Millichamp v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924