Legal Opinion
State v. Deaton, 4-08-03 (8-18-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 2008No. 4-08-03PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, John W. Deaton (hereinafter "Deaton"), appeals the judgment of the Defiance County Court of Common Pleas denying his "Motion to Vacate Voidable Sentence Civil Rule 60(B)." For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
{¶ 2} On September 2, 2004, Deaton was indicted on three counts of rape of a person less than thirteen years of age, violations of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and first degree felonies. On March 22, 2005, pursuant to a plea agreement, Deaton plead guilty to and was convicted of counts one and two, and count three was dismissed. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. WaulkOhio Court of Appeals · 2016