Legal Opinion

Erwin Mfg. Co. v. Croft

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1931No. 8 Div. 284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Erwin Manufacturing Company, operating a textile mill near the city of Huntsville; sued “A. M. Croft, doing business as. Union Motor Freight Line,” for damages arising from injury to its plant, charged to the negligence of defendant’s employee.

Assuming there is evidence that “Union Motor Freight Line” was the business name used by defendant, Croft, he was engaged in operating a motor freight truck, transporting and delivering freight between Chattanooga and Huntsville, and between Scottsboro and Huntsville, and other intermediate points.

In delivering freight to plaintiff’s platform, connected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayor of Birmingham v. TayloeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. City of Montgomery v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. City of Birmingham v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cantlin v. PavlovichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API