Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerry Rorex
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-2288, 83-2289PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Jerry Rorex appeals from a conviction for knowingly possessing stolen property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Rorex contends that the District Court erred in overruling his motion to suppress certain statements made by him in response to questions asked by an FBI agent without giving the Miranda warnings. Rorex also alleges error in the District Court’s failure to give an instruction proffered by him relating to standards between merchants under the Arkansas Uniform Commercial Code. As we find these contentions to be without merit, we affirm the conviction.
Rorex also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Almarita JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Edward LebrunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. HelmelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Terry Gene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Billy Lee JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.