Legal Opinion

California v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1937No. 8121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

From an order of the referee in bankruptcy, affirmed by the bankruptcy court, disallowing the claims of the state comptroller for penalties claimed under the California tax law as a preferred lien claim entitled to full payment from the assets of the bankrupt estate, the State has appealed.

The Paul Kent Truck Company was adjudicated a voluntary bankrupt October 20, 1933. Respondent was appointed trustee thereafter. On June 23, 1933, the tangible assets of the bankrupt were seized and sold by a claimant of a conditional sales contract. In a suit by the trustee charging…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. BaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. In Re BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Boonville Nat. Bank of Boonville v. BlakeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Knox-Powell-Stockton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. In Re BurchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1948
  3. United States v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API