Legal Opinion

La Page v. Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of support based upon a prior order of filiation. He contends that the evidence of paternity was insufficient and that the court erred in denying his motion to reopen the proof for expert testimony challenging the HLA test result.

The evidence of paternity, without regard to the HLA test, was clear and convincing based upon the hospital records and petitioner’s testimony, which the court found credible (see, *623Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G., 59 NY2d 137; Matter of Bradley W. v Mary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Bradley W. v. Mary Ann N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vickers v. HoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Sutton v. ScheidtOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API