Legal Opinion

Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. Moss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1936No. 24856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial court, Moss Webb, and Hill, as plaintiffs, sued the Cos-den Company for damages for failure to complete a test well for oil and gas according to contract.

The facts were that the defendant company had obligated itself by agreement with plaintiffs to drill such test well to a depth of 2,000 feet, “unless oil or gas in paying quantities or a real granite formation was encountered at a lesser depth.” The defendant drilled the well to a depth of 1,410 feet, when it discontinued the drilling of the well and abandoned the same without having found oil or gas; the defendant contending at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. DobynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. City of Weatherford v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Kimberlin v. EphraimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Smith-Horton Drilling Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BradburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API