Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Noll

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1981No. 80-1098-OAPublished

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

The statutory amendments in question apply to injuries incurred between January 1, 1980 and May 12, 1980. Thus they have some retroactive effect.1 I reject the majority’s conclusion that the statutory amendments violate Art. I, see. 1, Wis. Const.,2 and the petitioners’ (employ*662ers’) contention that the statutory amendments violate the fourteenth amendment of the federal constitution or the contract clause of the federal constitution.3 Therefore I dissent.

The retroactive effect of these statutory amendments is to alter duties incident to injuries occurring before the amendments were enacted.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hoyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API