Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 5, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On July 22, 1971, six days before a decree nisi granting a divorce to the husband was to become absolute, the wife filed objections to the decree. G. L. c. 208, § 21, as in effect prior to St. 1975, c. 400, § 26. Rule 45 of the Probate Courts (1959). On March 29, 1978, the husband moved to dismiss the objections. A judge of the Probate Court heard the matter on *841a statement of agreed facts and ordered the objections dismissed. The wife’s “motion for rehearing” of the dismissal was denied, and the husband’s counsel was awarded fees and expenses in connection with the hearing on that motion. G.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lye v. LyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Scholz v. ScholzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Holbrook v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Priestley v. Sharaf's, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Gailis v. GailisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Giner v. GinerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API