Legal Opinion

Mazza v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 9, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

In this matter which was certified for disposition by us, the municipality granted a zoning variance to authorize construction of a garden apartment on land zoned against such structures. During pendency of the appeal the city amended the zoning ordinance in such fashion that garden apartments became a permitted use in the zone where the property in question is located. Under the circumstances, on the record before us the issue is moot, and therefore the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekanbis,…

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Carmel Estates, Inc. v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. MATTHEW GLENN VS. CITY OF CAPE MAY PLANNING BOARD (L-0408-15, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API