Legal Opinion

Strohm v. Good

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888No. 12,369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The material allegations of the appellee’s complaint are these: On the 27th day of April, 1883, Magdalena Good was the owner of a parcel of land, and on that day she and her husband entered into a written contract with Joseph Strohm, wherein she agreed to sell and convey it to him. Among other promises forming part of the consideration agreed to be paid for the land, was a promise on the part of Joseph Strohm to assume and pay a mortgage previously executed by Magdalena Good to Solomon Stahley. *94This mortgage covered the land purchased by Strohm, and also other lands of the mortgagor. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Elston v. CastorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hewitt v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Petry v. AmbrosherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coburn v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Backer v. PyneIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Boos v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mihoover v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Simmons v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API