Heiland v. Dunnick
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
This case comes before us on petition for review of an unpublished Court of Appeals’ decision in Heiland v. Dunnick, No. 81,319, filed February 4, 2000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal because Heiland did not timely file a petition for review under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions (KJRA), K.S.A. 77-601 et seq. We conclude that the KJRA is the exclusive remedy in this case but further conclude that the time for filing a petition for review under the KJRA had not begun to run…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Reifschneider v. Kansas State LotterySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Douglass v. Kansas State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Friedman v. Kansas State Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Friedman v. KAN. STATE BD. OF HEALING ARTSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Williams v. DesLauriersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.