Legal Opinion
People v. Bettistea
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1989No. Docket 87225PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
T. K. Boyle, J.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced for two separate criminal incidents and on two habitual offender counts. His convictions were affirmed, 173 Mich App 106; 434 NW2d 138 (1988), but the cases were remanded to permit the trial court to hold a hearing on two issues related to the validity of the habitual offender convictions.
At the hearing, defendant attacked the validity of three prior plea-based convictions. He also argued that, under People v Stoudemire, 429 Mich 262; 414 NW2d 693 (1987), two of the convictions, having been entered on the same date, should only…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. GintherMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. PlumajMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. HamptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- May v. HowardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025