Savage v. E. R. Snell Contractor, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs Reba Savage, Jack Savage, and Erin Glanton Savage (collectively, the “Savages”) sued the Georgia Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and E. R. Snell Contractor, Inc. (“Snell”), alleging that the defendants’ road widening project created flooding on the Savages’ property. Snell moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. DOT filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Savages’ claims were barred based on their failure to give the requisite ante litem notice pursuant to OCGA § 50-21-20, and the trial court granted the motion in part…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Williams v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Hubbard v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Cummings v. Georgia Department of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Regents v. CanasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- DeFloria v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- City of Greensboro v. Tony RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Liberty County v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- DeKALB COUNTY v. KIRKLAND Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.