Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Meher

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided December 3, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01153Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ) DACARLOS WATKINS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-01153-STA-atc ) JOHN MEHER, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MODIFY DOCKET, DISMISSING § 2241 PETITION, CERTIFYING THAT APPEAL NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH, AND DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Petitioner Dacarlos Watkins has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition (the “Petition”), pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241.1

(ECF No. 7.) The pleading is before the Court for preliminary review. See

28 U.S.C. § 2243

(“A court . . .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atkins v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Witham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1994
  4. Girts v. YANAICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Sandles v. HemingwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API