Neill v. State

Mikell, Judge.

Kevin Glenn Neill appeals his felony conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine. On appeal, Neill argues that the trial court erred by admitting a hotel registration card and Neill’s custodial statements into evidence. Neill also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

As recognized in cases such as Shabazz v. State, 1 on appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determine whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of…