Legal Opinion

Housing Author. v. Hartford Acc. and Indem.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 29, 2006No. 1040885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On April 21, 2004, the Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville ("the Housing Authority") sued Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford"), alleging that Consolidated Construction Company ("Consolidated"), for whom Hartford had issued a performance bond, had improperly installed fire-alarm systems at a residential facility operated by the Housing Authority. The complaint sought to enforce Hartford's obligations under the performance bond and demanded a judgment against Hartford "for compensatory damages in such amount as a jury may determine, plus interest and the costs of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Davis v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Bockman v. WCH, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. City of Birmingham v. Cochrane Roofing & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henderson v. MeadWestvaco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Be-Jeweled, L.L.C. v. AIG Baker Orange Beach Wharf, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Ala. Teachers Credit Union v. Design Build Concepts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  4. Weinrib v. WolterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Ex Parte Aig Baker Orange Beach WharfSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API