Legal Opinion
In re Registrant R.D.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 17, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ANTELL, P.J.A.D.
(retired and temporarily assigned on recall).
By order dated January 25, 2005, the Law Division granted the State’s motion to increase registrant’s Risk Assessment Score (“RAS”) from 36 to 45 and to re-tier him from Tier I, low risk sex offender, to Tier II, moderate risk. Registrant now appeals from that order on the ground that it violates principles of res judicata. He argues that the increased scoring from 36 to 45 results from a change in the court’s previous assessment of a static, not a dynamic, factor in his RAS which, under our…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF TOWN OF MORRISTOWN v. LittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Hodgson v. ApplegateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Quagliato v. BodnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re R.A.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- In Re RANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- In Re RdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006