State ex rel. Duggan v. Dillon
Supreme Court of Missouri
Prohibition. The taking of the bond was a judicial act. Blake v. Kimball’s Est., 22 Yt. 632. Supersedeas followed ipso facto from the filing of the bond. Ex parte Floyd, 40 Ala. 117.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— A rule was made in this case upon Daniel Dillon, judge of St. Louis circuit court, the clerk thereof, and the public administrator having in charge the estate of Michael Carroll, to show cause why they should not be prohibited from disbursing certain moneys deposited in that court in a cause of Tittman, Public Administrator, v. John Thornton, Peter Richard Kenrick and Michael Duggan ; and the question now is, whether the rule shall be discharged or made absolute.
Michael Carroll commenced a suit in the St. Louis circuit court against' John Thornton and Peter Richard Kenrick, and Duggan was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Gawtry v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. St. Louis & Kirkwood Railroad v. HirzelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- American Brewing Co. v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- American Brewing Co. v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State ex rel. Heckel v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Linck v. TrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.